phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frederick Haebin Na <haebin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Vanilla HBase vs. Phoenix vs. Phoenix salted insertion performance comparison.
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:57:04 GMT
Okay, the slow performance of the salted table was due to the small
connection pool size config in the Spring's JDBC, not because of the
Phoenix's default conf.

Best,
Haebin



2014-03-12 12:06 GMT+09:00 Frederick Haebin Na <haebin.na@gmail.com>:

> Hello all,
>
> I am doing a performance benchmark of Phoenix.
> For now, it just an insertion scenario, yet it turned out to be somewhat
> strange.
>
> I have 3 small node cluster for HBase with Phoenix.
>
> Insertion of 5K document with long key.
> 1. Vanilla HBase: 720 TPS (115 ms Mean Transaction Time)
> 2. Phoenix: 413 TPS (238 ms MTT)
> 3. Phoenix Salted (12 bucket): 195 TPS (514 ms MTT)
>
> Is the result plausible to you?
> Or should I tune something for phoenix? (such as client side thread pool
> size or so)
>
> Best,
> Haebin
>

Mime
View raw message