openwhisk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance tests for OpenWhisk
Date Wed, 02 Aug 2017 22:04:32 GMT
Following up here I requested a new repo incubator-openwhisk-performance
INFRA ticket here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14778


On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM Michael Marth <mmarth@adobe.com> wrote:

> Markus,
>
> Quick update: sent the below to users@infra. So far no reaction. The
> archive is here [1] but Bertrand tells me only ASF member have access  -
> for whatever reason.
>
> Michael
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/70999f9233dac9b416ef9dedc97c0ef196a938c05d6a407b94ba3479@%3Cusers.infra.apache.org%3E
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Michael Marth <mmarth@adobe.com<mailto:
> mmarth@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Dear Infra team,
>
> I am enquiring on behalf of the OpenWhisk project (currently in Incubator)
> [1].
>
> We would like to periodically run performance tests on a distributed
> environment (OpenWhisk typically runs on more than 1 machine). So we are
> basically looking for an ability to spin up/tear down a number of (virtual)
> machines and exclusively use them for a certain amount of time (so that the
> VMs are not shared and the performance test results are comparable over
> time).
> The order of magnitude would be ~5-10 VMs for 1 hour 3 times a week.
>
> I would like to find out if there is an ASF-supported mechanism to do that.
> For example, can Infra provide such infrastructure? Or is there a cloud
> provider (like Azure) that might sponsor such efforts with VMs? Or maybe
> there is an established way for commercial companies that are interested in
> an ASF project to sponsor (fund) such tests?
>
> If none of the above exists, then it would also be helpful for us to get to
> know how other projects run such sort of tests.
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Michael
>
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b66ab5b438f2db5cdc8c5f5eabece201b4ad090058fa3a9a3bd09d12@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
>
>
>
>
> From: Markus Thömmes <markusthoemmes@me.com<mailto:markusthoemmes@me.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@openwhisk.apache.org<mailto:dev@openwhisk.apache.org>" <
> dev@openwhisk.apache.org<mailto:dev@openwhisk.apache.org>>
> Date: Wednesday 26 April 2017 12:59
> To: "dev@openwhisk.apache.org<mailto:dev@openwhisk.apache.org>" <
> dev@openwhisk.apache.org<mailto:dev@openwhisk.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: Performance tests for OpenWhisk
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> yeah that sounds pretty much spot on. I'd like to have at least 2 VMs with
> 4+ cores and 8GB memory. One VM would host the management stack while one
> would be dedicated to an Invoker only. That way we could assert
> single-invoker performance the easiest.
>
> Thanks for helping!
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
>
> Am 26. April 2017 um 11:36 schrieb Michael Marth <mmarth@adobe.com<mailto:
> mmarth@adobe.com>>:
>
> Markus,
>
> Does what I describe reflect what you are looking for?
> If yes, I am happy to ask on infra.
>
> Let me know
> Michael
>
>
>
> On 26/04/17 07:52, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacretaz@apache.org<mailto:
> bdelacretaz@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Michael Marth <mmarth@adobe.com<mailto:
> mmarth@adobe.com>> wrote:
> ...Maybe our mentors can chime in. Has this been discussed in the ASF
> board or so?...
>
> Best would be to ask the ASF infrastructure team via
> users@infra.apache.org<mailto:users@infra.apache.org> - briefly describe
> what you need to see what's
> possible.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message