ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sathwik B P <sathwik...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Move towards binary compatibility to JDK 1.6 or JDK 1.7 for 1.3.7 RELEASE
Date Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:01:22 GMT
Hi Tammo,

As i have indicated we need to migrate to new Annotation Api, which is
required only for our release branch Ode-1.3.x

Can you build a new docker image based on jdk 8.

We might as well discuss and make ODE 1.3.7 as the last maintanance release
from 1.3.x and then move to the trunk for future releases.

Regards,
Sathwik
On Nov 28, 2015 3:22 PM, "Sathwik B P" <sathwik.bp@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi pierre,
> I am doing good. Thank you.
> How's business process discussion going on. If you need us let us know.
>
> Moving to higher jdk has been sitting from long time. The reason i have
> brought this issue is because of the use of legacy Annotations Api which
> has been removed in jdk 8.
>
> ODE source code current release branch ODE-1.3.x is non compilable on jdk
> 8.
>
> The new Annotation Api is available in jdk 1.6,1.7
>
> TRUNK branch is compilable on jdk 8 as as we have a completly new Jacob
> implementation.
>
> I would prefer jdk 8 as the baselining for 1.3.7 release. Will wait for
> responses from the commmunity
> On Nov 28, 2015 4:49 AM, "Tammo van Lessen" <tvanlessen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for moving to JDK 7 (although its also already EOL), so JDK 8 would
>> also
>> be an option if nobody objects.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Sathwik B P <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > This is a proposal to move towards minimum compliance to JDK 1.6 or 1.7
>> > from existing JDK 1.5 for ODE 1.3.7 RELEASE.
>> >
>> > Is there anyone still on JDK 5 or 6? Let us know if there are any
>> concerns.
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > sathwik
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message