ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:55:27 GMT
Thanks.  I had to look at the Nabble.com post to find it.

I'll look into it.

alex


On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:47 AM, rjoshi <rinku24@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Uploaded Loop-sa.zip file in initial post.
>
>
>
> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >
> > If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce your
> > tests, I can probably offer some guidance.  Right now, we have too little
> > information to help.
> >
> > alex
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <rinku24@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
> >> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We executed
> >> same
> >> service on same testbed.
> >> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this solutions.
> >> Used as is.
> >>
> >> So it i apple to apple comparison.  Let me know if I am missing
> >> something.
> >> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to
> >> threads
> >> or any other optimization.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
> >> >
> >> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
> >> > engines?
> >> >
> >> > alex
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <rinku24@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App
> >> Server,
> >> >> ESB
> >> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
> >> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine  (part of ODE).
> >> >>
> >> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our
> >> preliminary
> >> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms
> >> of
> >> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine
> >> independently
> >> >> to
> >> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine,
> >> with
> >> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > alex
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <rinku24@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Guys,
> >> >> >>   We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our
Service
> >> >> >> Orchestration application. I read  in many blogs that ODE
out
> >> performs
> >> >> >> other
> >> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having
> poor
> >> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> >> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> >> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> >> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total
100
> >> >> >> threads)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Test case:
> >> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and
2nd
> as
> >> a
> >> >> >> String.
> >> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while
loop
> of
> >> >> that
> >> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
> >> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> >> >> >>   int index = 0, count = 0;
> >> >> >>  int length = data.length;
> >> >> >>  while (index++ < iteration) {
> >> >> >>     count = (index + 1) % length ;
> >> >> >>  }
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Result:
> >> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second.  Higher is better.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> >> >> >> 1                      -------   798               ----- 
  930
> >> >> >> 10                   --------   357               -----  
 933
> >> >> >> 100                 --------     49               -----  
 483
> >> >> >> 500                 -------      9                 ----- 
   123
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> >> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> >> >> >> See attachments below.
> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20445804.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message