ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:20:26 GMT
Right, but that's not answering my question.

How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both engines?

alex


On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <rinku24@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App Server,
> ESB
> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
>
> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine  (part of ODE).
>
> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our preliminary
> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms of
> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine independently to
> find out what is the performance of individual component.
>
>
>
> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >
> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine, with
> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <rinku24@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Guys,
> >>   We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
> >> Orchestration application. I read  in many blogs that ODE out performs
> >> other
> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
> >>
> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
> >> threads)
> >>
> >> Test case:
> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
> >> String.
> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of that
> >> many times. Psuedo code:
> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> >>   int index = 0, count = 0;
> >>  int length = data.length;
> >>  while (index++ < iteration) {
> >>     count = (index + 1) % length ;
> >>  }
> >> }
> >>
> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
> >>
> >> Result:
> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second.  Higher is better.
> >>
> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> >> 1                      -------   798               -----    930
> >> 10                   --------   357               -----    933
> >> 100                 --------     49               -----    483
> >> 500                 -------      9                 -----     123
> >>
> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> >> See attachments below.
> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
> >>
> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message