ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: InstanceManagement.ListInstances, filter broken?
Date Thu, 22 May 2008 13:30:30 GMT
Hi,
I've compiled and built 1.2 and I can confirm it works, brilliant, thanks
:)
- Ciaran

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've found the origin of the link problem you were having [1] and fixed it,
> both on trunk and on the 1.1 branch. Can you give it a try by getting 1.1
> and compiling it? I've got your little test case working (and added it to
> our test suite) after getting rid of the assignment problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Matthieu
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-289
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Ciaran <ciaranj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Ciaran <ciaranj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sadly it doesn't complete for me :( If I move the
> > 'State-Simple_Inbound'
> > > > sequence into the if clause of the 'TRansitionResolver2' element, and
> > > > remove
> > > > the 'transition4' link (which is no longer needed) then it does
> > complete,
> > > > very strange :(
> > > >
> > >
> > > I started having a look yesterday but was doing too many things in
> > parallel
> > > and haven't had time to identify the problem yet. But tomorrow is
> another
> > > day :)
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there an alternative construct to flow which allows me to route
> > > between
> > > > different activities, I don't care about concurrency none of my
> > > activities
> > > > need to be executed 'concurrently', sequence doesn't let me move
> about
> > > > between activities, I've tried scope but when using a scope none of
> the
> > > > contained activities can see the links defined in the parent
> > > flow/sequence
> > > > etc.   Is scope what I need, and should I just try and persevere with
> > it
> > > ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > What about writing what you want to do in pseudo-code so we can
> > understand
> > > what you want to do? From there we can probably suggest a way to model
> > your
> > > BPEL.
> >
> > Ironically there is no pseudo-code :(   I'm converting a State-transition
> > network to BPEL, where each state is a sequence of steps.  Each state can
> > lead to one or more other states until a terminal state is reached.
> (There
> > is some logic in there to remove cyclic paths, so effectively its an
> > acylic-graph)
> >
> > A state can only execute one at a time, so there is no concurrency, i.e I
> > would like to model:
> >
> >                       ,D
> >                     .'
> > A -> B ->C  '--------F
> >                     `\
> >                        \,
> >                         E
> > Where the route to D  E or F can be conditional,   currently A,B,C, D, E
> > and
> > F are represented as indvidual 'sequences' inside a flow with the
> > transitions beween them done as links.  If there are conditional links
> > leading from a state  then that state will have a link to an 'if' element
> > which contains the relevant tests and the source element of a link to the
> > 'next' correct state.
> >
> > Does this make sense at all ?
> > Many Thanks
> > - Cj.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Matthieu
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks
> > > > - Ciaran.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Alex Boisvert <
> boisvert@intalio.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I just took a look at the BPEL and it looks valid.  The flow should
> > > > > complete
> > > > > after all the links have fired.  We'll need to run it and see what
> > > > actually
> > > > > happens to determine the issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Ciaran <ciaranj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > As promised the attached file (really a .zip file, stupid virus
> > > > scanners)
> > > > > > contains a ready-to-deploy testcase that will never return :(
..
> > What
> > > > am
> > > > > I
> > > > > > doing wrong!??! (Please  note the BPEL *is* a bit wrong as I've
> > just
> > > > > hacked
> > > > > > it together to demonstrate my issue (as in I'm not assign the
> > > > > receive/reply
> > > > > > variables correctly!) but that shouldn't be relevant.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any clues? Please, if I can't get this working I have to abandon
> my
> > > > > > investigations with ODE which is a shame as I was pretty keen
> until
> > > > now!
> > > > > > (Hopefully its just my rubbish BPEL skills!)
> > > > > > -Ciaran
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alex Boisvert <
> > boisvert@intalio.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ciaran <ciaranj@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > >> > Thanks for looking into this Alex, can I configure
ODE to use
> > the
> > > > > >> Hibernate
> > > > > >> > DAO for the Derby DB it ships with, or am I left using
the
> > OpenJPA
> > > > > >> version?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> You can use the Hibernate DAO by setting,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ode-axis2.dao.factory=org.apache.ode.daohib.bpel.BpelDAOConnectionFactoryImpl
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> in your ode-axis2.properties file.  (And using the Hibernate
> > > database
> > > > > >> schemas)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Also I'm having some serious (blocking :( ) issuess
getting my
> > > BPEL
> > > > > >> working
> > > > > >> > in ODE, I *think* I've finally tracked the issue down
to a
> flow
> > > that
> > > > > has
> > > > > >> > several complex routes through it (links marshalled
by 'if'
> > > > elements),
> > > > > >> it
> > > > > >> > seems that if any of the top-level elements in the
flow
> element
> > > are
> > > > > >> targets
> > > > > >> > of links who's sources are 'empty' elements in some
of my
> elseif
> > > > > >> elements
> > > > > >> > elsewhere, and these elseif elements do not execute
then my
> BPEL
> > > > flow
> > > > > >> sits
> > > > > >> > waiting for these links to 'falsify'  (which will never
happen
> > as
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > workflow has effectively finished going down the expected
> > route).
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > My understand of these things isn't great, but I think
the
> issue
> > > is
> > > > > >> whether
> > > > > >> > DPE is being successfully applied in this particular
situation
> > (I
> > > > can
> > > > > >> find
> > > > > >> > a
> > > > > >> > DPE issue filed in JIRA for when sequences fault, but
I don't
> > > think
> > > > > this
> > > > > >> is
> > > > > >> > my case exactly).   I'm trying to create the smallest
test
> case
> > so
> > > > > with
> > > > > >> > luck
> > > > > >> > someone will be able to tell me that what i'm trying
to do in
> > BPEL
> > > > is
> > > > > >> > illegal (it should be noted however that it works in
other
> BPEL
> > > > > engines
> > > > > >> :(
> > > > > >> > )
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Yep, a small reproducible test case is key here...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> alex
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > - Ciaran
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > - Ciaran
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Ciaran
> >
>



-- 
- Ciaran

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message