ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ashwini Kumar Jeksani <Ashwini_Jeks...@infosys.com>
Subject RE: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration
Date Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:00:12 GMT


Does Tuscany support SCA Extentions to WS-BPEL? If it doesn't then I guess we could look into
that one as well.

Thanks & Regards
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani

-----Original Message-----
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1975@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:11 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
Cc: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org; dev@ode.apache.org; user@ode.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA & BPEL Integration

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
>  > Now that we are making more progress with the SCA & BPEL integration
>  > and have figured out how to make References to work, let's discuss
>  > what could be the next steps on this area. Below are couple examples
>  > of what we could do next
>  >
>  > - WS-BPEL Process Introspection : Currently we are requiring SCA
>  > componentType files, we could introspect the BPEL process file to
>  > generate the component type information from it.
>  >
>  > - Integrate BEPL with the store scenario tutorial : We could add a
>  > OrderProcessing step to the store checkout, and illustrate a more real
>  > integration scenario.
>  >
>  > Other then these, we could review the
>  > SCA_ClientAndImplementationModelFor BPEL and identify other areas that
>  > we might need enhancements. Scenarios / Samples / Demos are always
>  > welcome too. Or if you have other suggestions, feel free to jump to
>  > the discussion.
>  >
>  > BTW: Copying the ODE list in case they want to jump and help, or in
>  > case they have other ideas.
>  >
>  >
>  Not a very exciting one but is there any clean up of the dependencies
>  possible? Currently using the implementation.bpel extension brings in 78
>  addition dependency jars at about 20meg, i wondered if some of those could
>  get excluded?
>    ...ant

Part of this is because we have a Embedded ODE BPEL engine, and that
itself brings several dependencies. But this is certainly something to
investigate. It would be also good if ODE could be more
flexible/dynamic with some dependencies (e.g Saxon) and only really
require these dependencies if they are going to be in use, this would
help our side as well.

Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer

**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of
the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail
and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this
e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail
may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk,
but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail.
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys
reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this
e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys
e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

View raw message