ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Performance and comparisons
Date Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:12:25 GMT
More recently, I've reached 200+ msgs/second on my laptop (dual-core) with
the Ode 1.1 branch.  I'm expecting the trunk (with all the
thread/transaction refactoring) to put us in overdrive once it's
stabilized.   But don't believe us, go benchmark it!  :)

alex

On 9/14/07, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> To add on Paul's reply, Alex had done some performance measurements some
> time ago. See:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Ode-Performance%3A-Round-I-tf3880525.html#a10997631
>
> We would probably fare better now as several of the improvements Alex
> mentions have been implemented. Which doesn't mean there's not more to do,
> there's actually still quite a bit of possible optimizations. An important
> thing to note on that side is that ODE support both persistent and in
> memory
> processes living at the same time within the same engine. So you can where
> you want to be fast and where you want to be reliable.
>
> Other than that, I believe the pi-calculus architecture is better. From a
> user standpoint you don't directly care much, but it has important
> implications on scalability and maintenance that you benefit from.
>
> Finally and most crucial: all committers are nice guys :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Matthieu
>
> On 9/14/07, Paul Brown <paulrbrown@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Thilina --
> >
> > Well, albeit that I'm certainly biased, here are a few things that
> > folks won't argue with:
> >
> > - ODE is the only BPEL engine with a business-friendly,
> > extender-friendly license.  There are other engines, who shall remain
> > nameless, that are available under a GPL or LGPL license.
> >
> > - ODE has a diverse and open community that is neither controlled nor
> > dominated by any commercial entity.
> >
> > - ODE provides a good level of flexibility for integration into other
> > middleware (AXIS2, ServiceMix, TBD).
> >
> > - Since the olden days, ODE (since before it was ODE) has won customer
> > "bake-off" competitions against other BPEL engines.  Typically, ODE
> > was at least even on speed (pretty constant constraint of throughput)
> > and better on ergonomics and compliance.
> >
> > -- Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/14/07, Thilina Gunarathne <csethil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Is there any performance data or performance comparisons available for
> > ODE.
> > >
> > > I would also like to know how ODE will be compared against other
> > > available BPEL engines. I mean what are the most compelling features
> > > of ODE which will rank it higher than the other engines..
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Thilina
> > >
> > > PS: Hope nobody will start a flame war. I just need the date :).
> > > --
> > > Thilina Gunarathne  - http://thilinag.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > paulrbrown@gmail.com
> > http://mult.ifario.us/
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message