ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jens Goldhammer <Goldhammer.J...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Problems with ODE 1.1 Release
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:02:18 GMT


thanks for your answer.
I want to ask the other way round. Is this behaviour bpel2-compliant?
The problem is that we don´t want to develop the processes only for the ODE
BPEL Engine...
We have to be sure that other bpel engines expect the same or this does not
lead to an error...

Is there an other way for being compliant and make semantically the same?
We don´t want to give up the flexibility to create complex types...


Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Jens Goldhammer <Goldhammer.Jens@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Isn´t it possible that ODE makes this initialisation? I saw in the old
>> processes which we have made with activeBpel contain this function ...
>> and
>> it worked very well.
>> Can you change the behaviour of ODE in this case?
> It's certainly possible to initialize variables with a minimal XML
> template
> that would be type-compatible in many cases... although the rules and
> bounds
> for creating the template must be easily understandable otherwise you
> would
> be trading one problem for another.
> Feel free to open a Jira enhancement for it.  I think we should organizing
> enhancements according to level of difficulty, scope and also have people
> vote for new features.  I'm also hoping it would incite people to start
> hacking on Ode...
> alex

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-ODE-1.1-Release-tf4355659.html#a12630554
Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message