ode-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: A question about Redundant WSDL
Date Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:45:31 GMT
Hi Simon,

The only way I can think of right now would be to use absolute file:// URLs
pointing to a shared area on your computer.

Another way would be to share files by using the JBI shared library
mechanism and resolving files using "classpath://" style URLs, although
that's not implemented and just an idea I'm throwing on top of my head right


On 7/25/07, Simon Sekat <sekatsimon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had my first BPEL program working in servicemix.  In this program, the
> BPEL service unit orchestrates two webservice service units.  I have a
> question about the WSDL of the two webservices that I have to include,
> redundantly, in my BPEL service unit.
> Let me explain the details of my BPEL service unit.
> The BPEL code in the BPEL service unit includes the local copy of the
> involved WSDL, as shown below.
> <bpws:import importType="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" location="
> person1.wsdl" namespace="http://servicemix.apache.org/samples/wsdl-first
> "/>
> <bpws:import importType="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" location="
> person2.wsdl" namespace="http://servicemix.apache.org/samples/wsdl-second
> "/>
> The local copy of the involved WSDL is the same as the WSDL existing in
> the
> two webservice service units, except that I had to define patnerlinktype
> in
> my local copy, as shown below.
>     <plnk:partnerLinkType name="Person1PartnerLinkType">
>         <plnk:role name="Provider" portType="tns:Person"/>
>     </plnk:partnerLinkType>
> I feel the local copy of the WSDL is redundant.  Is there a way to
> eliminate
> this redundancy?  For example, include the external WSDL via a URL?  If
> so,
> where should I define the partnerLinkType ?
> Thank you,
> --
> Simon S.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message