-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72726/#review221449
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/csi/v0_volume_manager.cpp
Lines 645-651 (original), 645-651 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72726/#comment310465>

    I am a bit confused about the purpose of this code. This is a `foreach` loop for `services`, but in each iteration of the loop we always use the **first service** (i.e. `*services.begin()`) or the **CONTROLLER_SERVICE** (the old code) to make the `getPluginInfo` call. And in the code below, we compare the result of each call, but I think they must be consistent since we make the exactly same call in each iteration, right?
    
    So I guess we should make the `getPluginInfo` call with the `service` variable as the first parameter, right?


- Qian Zhang


On Aug. 1, 2020, 3:03 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72726/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 1, 2020, 3:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10163
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10163
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, the volume managers would assume that they could
> make CONTROLLER_SERVICE calls during plugin initialization,
> regardless of whether or not the plugin provides that service.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/csi/v0_volume_manager.cpp 4b056e7525a5dde62e5e74bf592bfa37cccf7736 
>   src/csi/v1_volume_manager.cpp 9e449472252fd03940abaedcc5bd102fdaa63b47 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72726/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This change is necessary for a subsequent test later in this chain to pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>