mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos Reviewbot Windows <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 66746: Replaced protobuf-specific comparators with MessageDifferencer.
Date Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:40:15 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/#review213669
-----------------------------------------------------------



FAIL: Failed to apply the current review.

Failed command: `python.exe .\support\apply-reviews.py -n -r 66746`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2932/mesos-review-66746

Relevant logs:

- [apply-review-66746.log](http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2932/mesos-review-66746/logs/apply-review-66746.log):

```
´╗┐error: patch failed: include/mesos/type_utils.hpp:23
error: include/mesos/type_utils.hpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp:23
error: include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/common/type_utils.cpp:36
error: src/common/type_utils.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/v1/mesos.cpp:35
error: src/v1/mesos.cpp: patch does not apply
```

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On April 20, 2018, 8:19 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 20, 2018, 8:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The MessageDifferencer utility has been available since protobuf 3.0.0.
> When comparing most repeated fields, we treat them as sets so the order
> of elements doesn't matter. In some exceptional cases, we treat them as
> list so the order becomes important. Further, fields with default
> purposes are considered to be set for comparison purposes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/type_utils.hpp 19ea81716496bcc0117a1b0ff157a0374f38bbfa 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp fda3eb42061f820869a2d8da939fccadc4e5ddfb 
>   src/common/type_utils.cpp 33d63809b61a18e03ff745c88f024c71dd221ca2 
>   src/tests/master_allocator_tests.cpp e1aef8a9625a805e7ad2dfad37bfeedee82f160d 
>   src/v1/mesos.cpp 9b2df2dd798dff24a91a2604ab53c7fbb5ecfbcf 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` currently fails with:
>     DefaultExecutorCheckTest.CommandCheckSharesWorkDirWithTask
>     DefaultExecutorCheckTest.MultipleTasksWithChecks
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kapil Arya
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message