mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joseph Wu <jos...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 70186: Updated protobuf comments related to operation feedback.
Date Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:03:10 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70186/#review213633
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Joseph Wu


On March 11, 2019, 12:18 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70186/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 11, 2019, 12:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Gastón Kleiman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> While the `id` field in `Offer::Operation` was previously marked
> experimental, it is also wise to explicitly mark the related
> scheduler API calls and events as experimental to avoid any
> confusion.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 099873278bfc4ca0f28ce52f329cba0903cec7cb 
>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto 27634153b372584a214c9631a939254bd984c735 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 3656aa7f9d87ff3868bbc7b221d9fc7c5d7a00a3 
>   include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto 9b0f54604f5b7b904b52b7f0a24c3a6402659ef0

> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70186/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message