mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benjamin Bannier <benjamin.bann...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 69163: Set agent and/or resource provider ID in operation status updates.
Date Mon, 03 Dec 2018 13:20:15 GMT


> On Dec. 1, 2018, 4:16 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > src/resource_provider/manager.cpp
> > Lines 579 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/69163/diff/5/?file=2111250#file2111250line579>
> >
> >     Did you intend to do this in the current patch or make this a TODO?

No, this was intended to be a `TODO`.


> On Dec. 1, 2018, 4:16 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > src/tests/master_tests.cpp
> > Lines 9226 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/69163/diff/5/?file=2111253#file2111253line9226>
> >
> >     Could you run this test in repetition to ensure that we're not introducing any
flakiness?

I already did run this test in repetition and under stress during development. Are you hinting
that you saw a failure, or see a problem with the test setup?


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69163/#review210993
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 3, 2018, 2:20 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69163/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2018, 2:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Chun-Hung Hsiao, Gastón Kleiman, and James DeFelice.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9293
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9293
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch sets agent and/or resource provider ID operation status
> update messages. This is not always possible, e.g., some operations
> might fail validation so that no corresponding IDs can be extracted.
> 
> Since operations failing validation are currently directly rejected by
> the master without going through a status update manager, they are not
> retried either. If a master status update manager for operations is
> introduced at a later point it should be possible to forward
> acknowledgements for updates to the master's update manager (not agent
> ID, not resource provider ID).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/common/protobuf_utils.hpp 1662125ed3e47b179ee32d08c1d3af75553066ba 
>   src/common/protobuf_utils.cpp a45607eed4c4bae5010bcc3f3ffeabd6d911062a 
>   src/master/master.cpp 3b3824a67f46866cd64e32d7f9f92484b5891aa2 
>   src/resource_provider/manager.cpp 6c81c430e9e1205d71982a7fa2bcd9aa15fc01b2 
>   src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp a22c82c442304979fbdec0fcb74543077751a135

>   src/slave/slave.cpp 858b78620e1ef33f3587d0bd95a684917aaf5bbb 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp ef2c00101fc3d30c564a9ca34884dece2cdd2651 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp c08e7e6c1dbc3dd9eb980868e43368c0a423c3ee 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69163/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message