mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Meng Zhu <m...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 69098: Added a benchmark to compare quota and nonquota allocation performance.
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:39:15 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Oct. 22, 2018, 3:39 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman.


Changes
-------

Posted optimized build benchmark result.


Bugs: MESOS-6630
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6630


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

This benchmark evaluates the performance difference between nonquota
and quota settings. In both settings, the same allocations are made
for fair comparison.


Diffs
-----

  src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_benchmarks.cpp bf9167b63747f7b8a402d950947028436307082a



Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/diff/1/


Testing (updated)
-------

Result from optimized build on a multicore 2.2GHz machine:

Benchmark setup: 20 agents, 10 roles, 20 frameworks
Made 20 allocations in 3.508676ms for nonquota roles
Made 20 allocations in 7.901269ms for quota roles

Benchmark setup: 200 agents, 100 roles, 200 frameworks
Made 200 allocations in 63.407391ms for nonquota roles
Made 200 allocations in 279.002319ms for quota roles

Benchmark setup: 2000 agents, 1000 roles, 2000 frameworks
Made 2000 allocations in 4.003802373secs for nonquota roles
Made 2000 allocations in 20.503188535secs for quota roles


Thanks,

Meng Zhu


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message