mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos Reviewbot Windows <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 69098: Added a benchmark to compare quota and nonquota allocation performance.
Date Sat, 20 Oct 2018 07:36:17 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/#review209819
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 69098 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['69092', '69093', '69094', '69095', '69096', '69097', '69098']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2497/mesos-review-69098

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Oct. 20, 2018, 6:05 a.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 20, 2018, 6:05 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6630
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6630
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This benchmark evaluates the performance difference between nonquota
> and quota settings. In both settings, the same allocations are made
> for fair comparison.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_benchmarks.cpp bf9167b63747f7b8a402d950947028436307082a

> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Non-optimized build benchmark output: (more comprehensive evaluation result across versions
coming soon)
> 
> [ RUN      ] NonQuotaVsQuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithNonQuotaVsQuotaParam.NonQuotaVsQuota/0
> Added 20 agents in 7.75017ms
> Added 20 frameworks in 18.32336ms
> Benchmark setup: 20 agents, 10 roles, 20 frameworks
> Start nonQuota allocation
> Made 20 allocations in 17.017677ms for nonquota roles
> Start Quota allocation
> Made 20 allocations in 50.428526ms for quota roles
> [       OK ] NonQuotaVsQuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithNonQuotaVsQuotaParam.NonQuotaVsQuota/0
(99 ms)
> 
> 
> [ RUN      ] NonQuotaVsQuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithNonQuotaVsQuotaParam.NonQuotaVsQuota/1
> Added 200 agents in 45.158088ms
> Added 200 frameworks in 649.806597ms
> Benchmark setup: 200 agents, 100 roles, 200 frameworks
> Start nonQuota allocation
> Made 200 allocations in 293.943471ms for nonquota roles
> Start Quota allocation
> Made 200 allocations in 1.945455585secs for quota roles
> [       OK ] NonQuotaVsQuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithNonQuotaVsQuotaParam.NonQuotaVsQuota/1
(2974 ms)
> 
> 
> [ RUN      ] NonQuotaVsQuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithNonQuotaVsQuotaParam.NonQuotaVsQuota/2
> Added 2000 agents in 310.070738ms
> Added 2000 frameworks in 49.139360942secs
> Benchmark setup: 2000 agents, 1000 roles, 2000 frameworks
> Start nonQuota allocation
> Made 2000 allocations in 19.216226126secs for nonquota roles
> Start Quota allocation
> Made 2000 allocations in 3.00175930081667mins for quota roles
> [       OK ] NonQuotaVsQuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithNonQuotaVsQuotaParam.NonQuotaVsQuota/2
(250392 ms)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message