mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos Reviewbot Windows <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 69097: Added an allocator benchmark for quota performance.
Date Sat, 20 Oct 2018 03:38:20 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69097/#review209818
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 69097 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['69092', '69093', '69094', '69095', '69096', '69097']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2496/mesos-review-69097

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Oct. 20, 2018, 9:29 a.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69097/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 20, 2018, 9:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6630
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6630
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This benchmark evaluates the allocator performance in
> the presence of roles with both small quota (which can
> be satisfied by half an agent) as well as large quota
> (which need resources from two agents). We setup the cluster,
> trigger one allocation cycle and measure the elapsed time.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_benchmarks.cpp bf9167b63747f7b8a402d950947028436307082a

> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69097/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Non-optimized build benchmark output: (more comprehensive evaluation result across versions
coming soon)
> 
> [ RUN      ] QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/0
> Added 20 agents in 5.309874ms
> Added 25 frameworks in 27.042131ms
> Benchmark setup: 20 agents,25 roles,25 frameworks
> Start allocation
> Made 30 allocations in 48.177949ms
> Made 0 allocations in 29.614912ms
> [       OK ] QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/0
(120 ms)
> [ RUN      ] QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/1
> Added 200 agents in 34.231511ms
> Added 250 frameworks in 1.357743423secs
> Benchmark setup: 200 agents,250 roles,250 frameworks
> Start allocation
> Made 300 allocations in 2.914780849secs
> Made 0 allocations in 2.810148522secs
> [       OK ] QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/1
(7214 ms)
> [ RUN      ] QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/2
> Added 2000 agents in 313.264128ms
> Added 2500 frameworks in 2.05919510856667mins
> Benchmark setup: 2000 agents,2500 roles,2500 frameworks
> Start allocation
> Made 3000 allocations in 4.4429533321mins
> Made 0 allocations in 3.98358875688333mins
> [       OK ] QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam.LargeAndSmallQuota/2
(633498 ms)
> [----------] 3 tests from QuotaParam/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_WithQuotaParam (640834
ms total)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message