mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Schwartzmeyer <and...@schwartzmeyer.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 67931: Support Image Manifest Version 2 Schema 2.
Date Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:16:54 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#review206157
-----------------------------------------------------------



There is still more to review... I'll get to it.


include/mesos/docker/spec.hpp
Lines 124-126 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289057>

    I think this and the commit before need to be re-ordered, as this commit is introducing
logic required and used by the previous commit.



include/mesos/docker/spec.hpp
Lines 141 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289058>

    Dumb question, but is there an S1/S2 for V1 as well?



include/mesos/docker/spec.hpp
Lines 141-164 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289060>

    I'm not sure, but would this be better as a variant?
    
    ```
    std::unique_ptr<Variant<v1::ImageManifest, v2::ImageManifest, v2_2::ImageManifest>>
manifest;
    ```
    
    (Declared at point of use.)
    
    P.S. Why do we need pointers?



include/mesos/uri/fetcher.hpp
Lines 84-96 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289059>

    Maybe add to this comment (and the one below) that this is used by the V2_S2 schema.



src/docker/spec.cpp
Lines 390-426 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289061>

    I think you'd get all of this for "free" out of a variant.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.cpp
Lines 467 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289062>

    Why do we need a `shared_ptr` here?



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.cpp
Lines 473 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289064>

    Heyyy what is this...



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.cpp
Lines 490 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289063>

    Why are we making this on the heap and using a pointer?



src/uri/fetcher.cpp
Line 56 (original), 56 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289065>

    We can delete this now! Also, add `MESOS-8570` to the "bug" field of this review, and
let's get you a JIRA account so I can assign it to you.



src/uri/fetcher.cpp
Lines 88 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/#comment289066>

    Why does this function throw away `urls`?


- Andrew Schwartzmeyer


On July 16, 2018, 11:35 a.m., Liangyu Zhao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 16, 2018, 11:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Akash Gupta, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Support parsing schema 2 and fetching blob with multiple URLs as
> specified in schema 2. Update `curl` version to 7.60.0 because of bug
> encountered in version 7.57.0.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/cmake/Versions.cmake 0a897d808cd9e05ac0d1a4e1ca61b8f3538f0c4a 
>   include/mesos/docker/spec.hpp 2879414dc42ffe633ac74b51e1bb116698c41162 
>   include/mesos/docker/v2_2.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   include/mesos/docker/v2_2.proto PRE-CREATION 
>   include/mesos/uri/fetcher.hpp 760d6b33234d8efdc533c0c6f05e83a5c7d1f56b 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 10b0946d6f49c7e9c201bad6f9f1b41cc8460fe5 
>   src/Makefile.am 228e168c22f3fd0367f029c506171c6979b31c07 
>   src/docker/spec.cpp 96fbf1f9cf1c2c4b2383607a97990f3a9156e6d9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 98129d006cda9b65804b518619b6addc8990410a

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.cpp a5683e3fe15dd35596122fcc0c580ae9d3adf7f2

>   src/uri/fetcher.hpp fbf64c6767dea3aa0798f68db8322ce47cd8ad36 
>   src/uri/fetcher.cpp 489c7ce0198ee6803dcc8eb9710b292fa743a0e8 
>   src/uri/fetchers/docker.hpp cdbab9a5684a68a729be12bc06d331acca137da5 
>   src/uri/fetchers/docker.cpp 55ca118660872a933a2dc186723bec6a39ee80f7 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67931/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Liangyu Zhao
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message