mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benjamin Bannier <benjamin.bann...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 65905: Used SHA512 for release file checksums.
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:02:38 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65905/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated March 5, 2018, 6:02 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Kapil Arya, Till Toenshoff, and Vinod Kone.


Changes
-------

Used output format compatible with `sha512sum` as suggested by James.


Repository: mesos


Description (updated)
-------

Apache now requires SHA checksum files instead of the previously
required MD5, see the [signing recommendations](1). This patch updates
the Mesos vote and release tooling to accommodate that change in
policy. We use SHA512 as recommended in the [Apache SHA checksum
FAQ](2).

We also fix the format of the produced digest file to be compatible
with `sha512sum` to ease automatic release verification.

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
[2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#sha-checksum


Diffs (updated)
-----

  support/release.sh 3aeda92e6bd48683cf609fa527633cd47b9f7dce 
  support/vote.sh 649eebc6b5fe1b3783ae0c2c1706f1349ddc436c 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65905/diff/3/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65905/diff/2-3/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Benjamin Bannier


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message