mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos Reviewbot <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 63994: Added a new test for validation of offer operation IDs.
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2018 13:17:19 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63994/#review198526
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [63994, 63992, 63991, 63989, 63988]

Failed command: python support/apply-reviews.py -n -r 63989

Error:
2018-03-02 13:17:17 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/63989/diff/raw/ [2654/2654] -> "63989.patch"
[1]
error: patch failed: include/mesos/mesos.proto:2222
error: include/mesos/mesos.proto: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto:2203
error: include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/common/protobuf_utils.cpp:400
error: src/common/protobuf_utils.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/master/master.cpp:9807
error: src/master/master.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/slave/slave.cpp:6974
error: src/slave/slave.cpp: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Reviewbot/21817/console

- Mesos Reviewbot


On March 2, 2018, 9:07 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63994/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 2, 2018, 9:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Gaston Kleiman, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8190
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8190
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a new test,
> 'SchedulerTest.OfferOperationFeedbackValidation',
> to verify that task and offer operation status updates are correctly
> sent when the 'id' field is set incorrectly on an operation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp 397a0908432ad50fa94fd939a604b096a06f8a1d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63994/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message