> On Feb. 12, 2018, 1:13 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/memory_profiler.cpp
> > Lines 706-708 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/diff/4/?file=1953408#file1953408line706>
> >
> > Why this is not a simple delay? To indicate that a profiling session is running?
It would be possible to implement the same without having the `profilingTimer` (the only change
being that the remaining time cannot be displayed), but binding that piece of state to a member
variable seems more inuitive to me than having it implicit.
- Benno
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/#review197256
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 21, 2018, 10:41 a.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2018, 10:41 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Benjamin Mahler.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This class exposes profiling functionality of jemalloc memory allocator
> when it is detected to be the memory allocator of the current process.
>
> In particular, it gives developers an easy method to collect and
> access heap profiles which report which pieces of code were
> responsible for allocating memory.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> 3rdparty/libprocess/Makefile.am c895d3ac7b9cc5ffd6c8b57ff24def866eb0213d
> 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/memory_profiler.hpp PRE-CREATION
> 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/process.hpp 8661706cb058efb26f5bfbcc84972f9930d3670f
> 3rdparty/libprocess/src/CMakeLists.txt 0ce7dac5deea94623530820d173ce3ffe5b42ea4
> 3rdparty/libprocess/src/memory_profiler.cpp PRE-CREATION
> 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 42e7adf740b234ebf23d2dcb71440749c0ed87ec
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63368/diff/6/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Benno Evers
>
>
|