-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/#review196990
-----------------------------------------------------------
support/post-reviews.py
Lines 202 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/#comment277033>
I'm tempted to make this fatal, since I cannot imagine a good reason why anyone would
want to still post the review, but I wanted to ask for other opinions first.
- Benno Evers
On Feb. 7, 2018, 2:33 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Feb. 7, 2018, 2:33 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Armand Grillet and Benjamin Bannier.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> The new check warns developers if the specified tracking
> branch is not fast-forwardable to HEAD. The most likely
> cause of this condition is pulling a new version of the `master`
> branch and forgetting to rebase the review before calling
> the `post-reviews.py` script.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> support/post-reviews.py 94b43253f25044a79009010e92363d1536c74299
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Benno Evers
>
>
|