mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benno Evers <bev...@mesosphere.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 65437: Added documentation for fault domains.
Date Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:04:02 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/#review196571
-----------------------------------------------------------




docs/fault-domains.md
Lines 74 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/#comment276267>

    This example actually differs from the description in the first section, but it seems
to me that placing all masters in the same data center somewhat defeats the goal of achieving
high availability, and  that most people would prefer running jobs in a remote data center
rather than having the "main" datacenter overloaded. But maybe someone with more insight into
the design of fault domains can comment on this?


- Benno Evers


On Jan. 31, 2018, 5:50 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 31, 2018, 5:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8483
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8483
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fault domains are a new feature in 1.5 which did not yet have
> a corresponding description in the documentation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/configuration/master-and-agent.md f247498ead43a16bbef5afb49d453073dd9ab6ef 
>   docs/fault-domains.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> No.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benno Evers
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message