mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jie Yu <yujie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 63094: Added resource version uuid for offer operations.
Date Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:02:04 GMT


> On Oct. 26, 2017, 11:08 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > src/messages/messages.proto
> > Lines 712 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/63094/diff/3/?file=1864433#file1864433line712>
> >
> >     Do we need multiple ResourceVersionUUIDs here? Can the master just include the
UUID for the relevant resource provider/agent?

Yeah, good point.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63094/#review189371
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 19, 2017, 9:35 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63094/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 19, 2017, 9:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benjamin Mahler, Chun-Hung Hsiao, Gaston
Kleiman, Greg Mann, Joseph Wu, Jan Schlicht, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The resource version UUID is used to establish the relationship
> between the operation and the resources that the operation is
> operating on. Each resource provider will keep a resource version
> UUID, and changes it when it believes that the resources from this
> resource provider are out of sync from the master's view.  The master
> will keep track of the last known resource version UUID for each
> resource provider, and attach the resource version UUID in each
> operation it sends out. The resource provider should reject operations
> that have a different resource version UUID than that it maintains,
> because this means the operation is operating on resources that might
> have already been invalidated.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/resource_provider/resource_provider.proto f5a9073075327019fd133bd51265f695ef464845

>   include/mesos/v1/resource_provider/resource_provider.proto e5cbede5b6e57a8641fca1ebfee5454f292cc24c

>   src/messages/messages.proto 0a32b3457e9143a7d48670610ca3e56dd516136f 
>   src/tests/resource_provider_manager_tests.cpp ca49e1f0203494fc8b4a4507c33e5a3885a14a59

>   src/tests/resource_provider_validation_tests.cpp f182bff4670318e9de22c2915c5dbb423a74ad6c

> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63094/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message