mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrei Budnik <abud...@mesosphere.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 60397: Check perf version compatibility in tests with disabled coredumps.
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:49:24 GMT


> On July 11, 2017, 5:48 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/linux/perf.cpp
> > Line 238 (original), 243-249 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60397/diff/4/?file=1772346#file1772346line243>
> >
> >     This is executing `perf --version` twice, and if someone were to call `perf::version()`
(or other `perf::` functions) without calling `perf::supported()` then the core dump issue
would surface again?
> >     
> >     Could we instead just update `perf::version` and all other perf commands we
run to disable core dumps? They all should be going through the `Perf` class in the implementation.
> >     
> >     (I don't think we mandated that any `perf::` function must only be called after
`perf::supported()` has been called and returned true)

`perf --check` is moved to `Perf::execute()`.


- Andrei


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60397/#review180223
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 11, 2017, 9:25 a.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60397/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 11, 2017, 9:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rojas, Benjamin Bannier, James Peach, and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7160
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7160
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For autotools build, the docker-build script performs a 'distcheck'
> build. This type of build warns if any unexpected files are left in
> the build directory after an uninstall, mainly to detect broken
> uninstall Makefile rules. The return status of the build container is
> the result of the distcheck.
> This fixes an issue where in some dockerized configurations
> invocations of 'perf' segfaulted (producing a core file as a
> side-effect), where the failure case was already anticipated and
> handled by the caller.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/perf.cpp b301e25d5cac6488c57e4f983e4867c72368a040 
>   src/tests/containerizer/perf_tests.cpp d8aab08eb131f974821fb85662cbc6cc685d2f3e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60397/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. make check (mac os x 10.12, fedora 25)
> 2. internal CI
> 
> Needs to be confirmed by Apache CI, e.g., reviewbot.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message