----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59294/#review175114 ----------------------------------------------------------- src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp Lines 586-588 (patched) Instead of shelling out, i'd say we just introduce support in the nl library. IN fact, we already have a patch chain starts here to support that https://reviews.apache.org/r/45605/ src/slave/flags.cpp Lines 770-786 (patched) This sounds like a heuristic. Any justification why this heuristic? Wondering if label based solution is better? For instance, the isolator will look for a special label of the task/executor. The label specifies the egress rate limit which can override the default rate limit. Something along this line? Then, the custom logic can be injected into a label decrorator, rather than first class it here? - Jie Yu On May 15, 2017, 8:56 p.m., Ian Downes wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/59294/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 15, 2017, 8:56 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Dmitry Zhuk, Ilya Pronin, Jie Yu, and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Bugs: MESOS-7508 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7508 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Add support to isolators/port_mapping for optionally scaling egress bandwidth with CPU and with minimum and maximum limits. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.hpp 9d38289c7161d5e931053b587d115684ccc44c94 > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp cd008aaebcd42554a9a81d2b059269546f59c966 > src/slave/flags.hpp e5784ef81ad0720c7ec061ee0b28b8fadae77afd > src/slave/flags.cpp bc63a6a4cb6115b4b4d592e67e34045f52b50d4c > src/tests/containerizer/port_mapping_tests.cpp a528382e8b4831b9c7e8dcc877a5e242909f0cd5 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59294/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > # added a new test > $ make check > > > Thanks, > > Ian Downes > >