mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Schwartzmeyer <and...@schwartzmeyer.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 58125: Stout: Added stringify for std::wstring.
Date Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:34:34 GMT


> On March 31, 2017, 11:46 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/stringify.hpp
> > Lines 42 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58125/diff/1/?file=1682876#file1682876line42>
> >
> >     I should probably have taken a `const std::wstring&` here. Also, is the
`<std::wstring>` 100% necessary?

* I cannot take a const reference here as the usages of `stringify` receive `std::wstring`
(for some reason the specialization isn't being picked up for a `const &`, I assume Micahel
Park can tell me why, though it's happy to be `const`ed).
* The `<std::wstring>` is not necessary.


- Andrew


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58125/#review170799
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 1, 2017, 4:32 a.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58125/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2017, 4:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jeff Coffler, John Kordich, Joseph Wu, Li Li, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Stout: Added stringify for std::wstring.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/stringify.hpp e9588d8d940046791794100c53469288656a14f0

> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58125/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing done later in chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Schwartzmeyer
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message