mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor.
Date Fri, 03 Mar 2017 02:10:24 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#review167782
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/launcher/executor.cpp
Lines 880 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#comment239745>

    Can you remind me again, why this logic is different for health checks vs checks? for
one, what to set into `healthy` field is passed as an argument to this function but what to
set in `check_status` is calculated inside. second, whether a health check is defined or not
doesn't have any bearing on the internals of this function, but check does.


- Vinod Kone


On Feb. 28, 2017, 3:54 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 28, 2017, 3:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp adcc50fb7df91b9f8dff0f583b61e0efcd6da378 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/56213/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message