mesos-reviews mailing list archives: February 2017

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable.
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:01
Benjamin Mahler     Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:01
Benjamin Mahler     Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Guangya Liu   Re: Review Request 55971: Updated the agent to be MULTI_ROLE capable. Sat, 04 Feb, 05:05
Re: Review Request 56006: Added CHECK logging to the allocator.
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 56006: Added CHECK logging to the allocator. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:03
Greg Mann Review Request 56187: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from Mesos tests. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:26
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56187: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from Mesos tests. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:15
Jan Schlicht   Re: Review Request 56187: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from Mesos tests. Thu, 02 Feb, 10:16
Greg Mann Review Request 56188: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from libprocess tests. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:26
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56188: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from libprocess tests. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:16
Mesos Reviewbot   Re: Review Request 56188: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from libprocess tests. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:42
Jan Schlicht   Re: Review Request 56188: Removed all instances of '.Times(1)' from libprocess tests. Thu, 02 Feb, 10:16
Re: Review Request 56055: Added validation for 'LAUNCH_NESTED_CONTAINER_SESSION'.
Greg Mann   Re: Review Request 56055: Added validation for 'LAUNCH_NESTED_CONTAINER_SESSION'. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:28
Jan Schlicht   Re: Review Request 56055: Added validation for 'LAUNCH_NESTED_CONTAINER_SESSION'. Thu, 02 Feb, 10:09
Re: Review Request 55972: Updated master to handle non-MULTI_ROLE agents.
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55972: Updated master to handle non-MULTI_ROLE agents. Wed, 01 Feb, 21:32
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 55972: Updated master to handle non-MULTI_ROLE agents. Wed, 01 Feb, 23:55
Benjamin Mahler     Re: Review Request 55972: Updated master to handle non-MULTI_ROLE agents. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55972: Updated master to handle non-MULTI_ROLE agents. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message.
Greg Mann   Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:08
Greg Mann   Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:12
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Fri, 03 Feb, 21:24
Greg Mann   Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 06:34
Adam B     Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 09:50
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 18:16
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 18:17
Greg Mann     Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Wed, 15 Feb, 23:20
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 16 Feb, 00:10
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 16 Feb, 00:14
Greg Mann         Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 16 Feb, 17:57
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Thu, 16 Feb, 17:57
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 56053: Added a 'SECRET' type to the 'Environment' protobuf message. Fri, 17 Feb, 19:46
Re: Review Request 55828: Updated Resources::apply to handle Resource.AllocationInfo.
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55828: Updated Resources::apply to handle Resource.AllocationInfo. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:24
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55828: Updated Resources::apply to handle Resource.AllocationInfo. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:40
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55828: Updated Resources::apply to handle Resource.AllocationInfo. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:40
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55828: Updated Resources::apply to handle Resource.AllocationInfo. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:40
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55828: Updated Resources::apply to handle Resource.AllocationInfo. Wed, 01 Feb, 23:13
Tomasz Janiszewski Review Request 56193: Use Docker cpus instead of cpu_share if possible. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:31
Mesos Reviewbot   Re: Review Request 56193: Use Docker cpus instead of cpu_share if possible. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:20
Re: Review Request 53096: Fix handling in shared count in total resources in the sorter.
Anindya Sinha   Re: Review Request 53096: Fix handling in shared count in total resources in the sorter. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:45
Anindya Sinha     Re: Review Request 53096: Fix handling in shared count in total resources in the sorter. Fri, 03 Feb, 22:01
Jiang Yan Xu       Re: Review Request 53096: Fix handling in shared count in total resources in the sorter. Fri, 03 Feb, 22:37
Re: Review Request 45962: Updated a persistent volume test framework to include shared volumes.
Anindya Sinha   Re: Review Request 45962: Updated a persistent volume test framework to include shared volumes. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:45
Anindya Sinha     Re: Review Request 45962: Updated a persistent volume test framework to include shared volumes. Fri, 03 Feb, 22:01
Re: Review Request 55359: Consolidate update of allocations in `updateAllocation()`.
Anindya Sinha   Re: Review Request 55359: Consolidate update of allocations in `updateAllocation()`. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:45
Anindya Sinha     Re: Review Request 55359: Consolidate update of allocations in `updateAllocation()`. Fri, 03 Feb, 22:01
Jiang Yan Xu       Re: Review Request 55359: Consolidate update of allocations in `updateAllocation()`. Mon, 06 Feb, 23:44
Anindya Sinha       Re: Review Request 55359: Consolidate update of allocations in `updateAllocation()`. Tue, 07 Feb, 05:02
Jiang Yan Xu         Re: Review Request 55359: Consolidate update of allocations in `updateAllocation()`. Tue, 07 Feb, 23:02
Re: Review Request 49571: Added a benchmark test for allocations.
Anindya Sinha   Re: Review Request 49571: Added a benchmark test for allocations. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:45
Anindya Sinha     Re: Review Request 49571: Added a benchmark test for allocations. Fri, 03 Feb, 22:01
Anindya Sinha       Re: Review Request 49571: Added a benchmark test for allocations. Tue, 07 Feb, 05:02
Anindya Sinha         Re: Review Request 49571: Added a benchmark test for allocations. Mon, 27 Feb, 20:50
Re: Review Request 55995: Restored quota correctly during allocator recovery.
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 55995: Restored quota correctly during allocator recovery. Wed, 01 Feb, 22:54
Re: Review Request 56004: Fixed MULTI_ROLE related bugs when updating framework info.
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 56004: Fixed MULTI_ROLE related bugs when updating framework info. Wed, 01 Feb, 23:38
Benjamin Mahler     Re: Review Request 56004: Fixed MULTI_ROLE related bugs when updating framework info. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 56004: Fixed MULTI_ROLE related bugs when updating framework info. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 56004: Fixed MULTI_ROLE related bugs when updating framework info. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files.
James Peach   Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Wed, 01 Feb, 23:51
James Peach     Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Wed, 01 Feb, 23:51
Jiang Yan Xu       Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:53
Jiang Yan Xu       Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Thu, 02 Feb, 01:31
Mesos Reviewbot     Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Thu, 02 Feb, 08:45
James Peach     Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Thu, 02 Feb, 17:32
Mesos Reviewbot       Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Thu, 02 Feb, 20:20
Jiang Yan Xu       Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Fri, 03 Feb, 23:57
James Peach       Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Sat, 04 Feb, 00:44
Jiang Yan Xu         Re: Review Request 53791: Use the stout ELF parser to collect Linux rootfs files. Sat, 04 Feb, 07:20
Re: Review Request 54878: Add some simple ldd() tests.
James Peach   Re: Review Request 54878: Add some simple ldd() tests. Wed, 01 Feb, 23:52
Jiang Yan Xu     Re: Review Request 54878: Add some simple ldd() tests. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:08
Jiang Yan Xu     Re: Review Request 54878: Add some simple ldd() tests. Fri, 03 Feb, 21:38
Kevin Klues Review Request 56195: Updated containerizer->launch path to close IOSwitchboard FDs on error. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:04
Kevin Klues   Re: Review Request 56195: Updated containerizer->launch path to close IOSwitchboard FDs on error. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:06
Kevin Klues     Re: Review Request 56195: Updated containerizer->launch path to close IOSwitchboard FDs on error. Thu, 02 Feb, 01:29
Kevin Klues       Re: Review Request 56195: Updated containerizer->launch path to close IOSwitchboard FDs on error. Thu, 02 Feb, 05:29
Mesos Reviewbot         Re: Review Request 56195: Updated containerizer->launch path to close IOSwitchboard FDs on error. Thu, 02 Feb, 10:32
Jie Yu         Re: Review Request 56195: Updated containerizer->launch path to close IOSwitchboard FDs on error. Thu, 02 Feb, 22:45
Kevin Klues         Re: Review Request 56195: Fixed ContainerLogger / IOSwitchboard FD leaks. Sat, 18 Feb, 18:39
Mesos Reviewbot           Re: Review Request 56195: Fixed ContainerLogger / IOSwitchboard FD leaks. Sat, 18 Feb, 20:31
Kevin Klues           Re: Review Request 56195: Fixed ContainerLogger / IOSwitchboard FD leaks. Sun, 19 Feb, 16:36
Re: Review Request 54712: Use the stout ELF parser to implement ldd.
Jiang Yan Xu   Re: Review Request 54712: Use the stout ELF parser to implement ldd. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:04
James Peach     Re: Review Request 54712: Use the stout ELF parser to implement ldd. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:15
James Peach   Re: Review Request 54712: Use the stout ELF parser to implement ldd. Thu, 02 Feb, 00:15
Jiang Yan Xu     Re: Review Request 54712: Use the stout ELF parser to implement ldd. Fri, 03 Feb, 21:36
Re: Review Request 55973: Update the tests to handle MULTI_ROLE support.
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 55973: Update the tests to handle MULTI_ROLE support. Thu, 02 Feb, 06:01
Benjamin Mahler     Re: Review Request 55973: Update the tests to handle MULTI_ROLE support. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Review Request 55973: Update the tests to handle MULTI_ROLE support. Sat, 04 Feb, 03:02
Guangya Liu   Re: Review Request 55973: Update the tests to handle MULTI_ROLE support. Sat, 04 Feb, 05:07
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:56
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 07 Feb, 01:38
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:55
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Fri, 10 Feb, 00:39
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:13
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:56
Gastón Kleiman       Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Wed, 08 Feb, 18:34
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Wed, 08 Feb, 21:06
Alexander Rukletsov         Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Thu, 09 Feb, 12:56
Vinod Kone           Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Fri, 10 Feb, 00:43
Gastón Kleiman           Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 14 Feb, 17:46
Alexander Rukletsov             Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 12:46
Alexander Rukletsov             Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 12:53
Gastón Kleiman             Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 13:57
Alexander Rukletsov             Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:30
Alexander Rukletsov           Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 11:12
Alexander Rukletsov             Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:49
Alexander Rukletsov               Re: Review Request 56208: Updated checks library with general check support. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:50
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:56
haosdent huang   Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Mon, 06 Feb, 08:21
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Tue, 07 Feb, 01:41
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:15
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:14
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:15
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:56
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Fri, 10 Feb, 00:47
Alexander Rukletsov         Re: Review Request 56209: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in command executor. Tue, 28 Feb, 14:00
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:57
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 01:08
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 11:18
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 11:53
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Fri, 10 Feb, 01:32
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:16
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:56
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 12:56
Gastón Kleiman         Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Tue, 14 Feb, 18:40
Alexander Rukletsov         Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in command executor. Tue, 28 Feb, 14:01
Alexander Rukletsov           Re: Review Request 56210: Reused previous task status for health updates in command executor. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:52
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:57
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Wed, 08 Feb, 01:09
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:16
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:56
Gastón Kleiman       Re: Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Thu, 09 Feb, 22:08
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:54
Alexander Rukletsov         Re: Review Request 56211: Renamed health checker in command executor for clarity. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:54
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:57
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 01:32
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:18
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 11:23
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Fri, 10 Feb, 01:35
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:16
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:56
Gastón Kleiman       Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Tue, 14 Feb, 18:59
Alexander Rukletsov         Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:13
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56212: Added support for general checks to command executor. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:54
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:57
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:18
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:56
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Fri, 10 Feb, 02:42
Gastón Kleiman         Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Tue, 14 Feb, 20:28
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 21:46
Gastón Kleiman         Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Thu, 16 Feb, 13:57
Gastón Kleiman       Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 13:41
Gastón Kleiman       Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 17:07
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56213: Added check tests for command executor. Tue, 28 Feb, 15:55
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56214: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in default executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:57
haosdent huang   Re: Review Request 56214: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in default executor. Mon, 06 Feb, 08:24
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56214: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:20
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56214: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:57
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 56214: Hashed unacknowledged updates by UUID string in default executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 22:00
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56215: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in default executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:58
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56215: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:21
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56215: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:57
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56215: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 21:06
Alexander Rukletsov         Re: Review Request 56215: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in default executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 12:56
Gastón Kleiman           Re: Review Request 56215: Reused previous task status to generate a new one in default executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 14:21
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56216: Renamed health checker collection in default executor for clarity. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:58
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56216: Renamed health checker collection in default executor for clarity. Wed, 08 Feb, 12:47
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56217: Added support for general checks to default executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:58
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56217: Added support for general checks to default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:22
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56217: Added support for general checks to default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:57
Gastón Kleiman       Re: Review Request 56217: Added support for general checks to default executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 14:32
Alexander Rukletsov Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 09:58
Mesos Reviewbot   Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Thu, 02 Feb, 14:31
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 15:22
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 16:57
Mesos Reviewbot       Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Wed, 08 Feb, 22:01
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 12:56
Mesos Reviewbot         Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Thu, 09 Feb, 17:09
Gastón Kleiman         Re: Review Request 56218: Added some check tests for default executor. Wed, 15 Feb, 14:45
Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message.
Jan Schlicht   Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 02 Feb, 10:11
Adam B   Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Fri, 03 Feb, 09:10
Greg Mann     Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 06:33
Greg Mann   Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 06:33
Adam B     Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 09:47
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 18:13
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 18:16
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 18:31
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 18:44
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 09 Feb, 19:46
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Fri, 10 Feb, 22:40
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Sat, 11 Feb, 01:40
Albert Strasheim     Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Tue, 14 Feb, 22:49
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Wed, 15 Feb, 22:49
Greg Mann     Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Wed, 15 Feb, 22:48
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Wed, 15 Feb, 23:20
Jan Schlicht       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 16 Feb, 13:35
Greg Mann       Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Thu, 16 Feb, 17:52
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 56052: Added the 'Secret' protobuf message. Fri, 17 Feb, 00:54
Re: Review Request 56139: Removed redundant 'Times(1)' from master validation tests.
Jan Schlicht   Re: Review Request 56139: Removed redundant 'Times(1)' from master validation tests. Thu, 02 Feb, 10:15
Greg Mann   Re: Review Request 56139: Removed redundant 'Times(1)' from master validation tests. Thu, 09 Feb, 06:35
Greg Mann     Re: Review Request 56139: Removed redundant 'Times(1)' from master validation tests. Wed, 15 Feb, 23:24
Re: Review Request 55900: Improved style in `HealthChecker`.
Gastón Kleiman   Re: Review Request 55900: Improved style in `HealthChecker`. Thu, 02 Feb, 16:54
haosdent huang     Re: Review Request 55900: Improved style in `HealthChecker`. Mon, 06 Feb, 06:29
Re: Review Request 54602: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in libprocess.
Alex Clemmer   Re: Review Request 54602: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in libprocess. Thu, 02 Feb, 19:46
Michael Park     Re: Review Request 54602: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in libprocess. Sun, 05 Feb, 07:12
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 54602: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in libprocess. Sun, 05 Feb, 01:39
Re: Review Request 54601: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in stout.
Alex Clemmer   Re: Review Request 54601: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in stout. Thu, 02 Feb, 19:47
Michael Park     Re: Review Request 54601: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in stout. Sun, 05 Feb, 07:11
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 54601: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in stout. Sun, 05 Feb, 01:39
Alex Clemmer     Re: Review Request 54601: Replaced `int` with `int_fd` in stout. Sun, 05 Feb, 09:08
Anthony Sottile Review Request 56236: Add `syntax = "proto2"` to some files automatically. Thu, 02 Feb, 20:12
haosdent huang   Re: Review Request 56236: Add `syntax = "proto2"` to some files automatically. Mon, 06 Feb, 16:57
Anthony Sottile Review Request 56237: Add `syntax = "proto2"; ` to the rest of the files. Thu, 02 Feb, 20:12
Anthony Sottile Review Request 56238: Allow a newer version of google protobuf. Thu, 02 Feb, 20:13
Mesos Reviewbot   Re: Review Request 56238: Allow a newer version of google protobuf. Fri, 03 Feb, 01:21
Anthony Sottile   Re: Review Request 56238: Allowed using protobuf 3 in python bindings. Sat, 18 Feb, 02:23
Anthony Sottile     Re: Review Request 56238: Allowed using protobuf 3 in python bindings. Sat, 18 Feb, 02:23
haosdent huang       Re: Review Request 56238: Allowed using protobuf 3 in python bindings. Sat, 18 Feb, 02:23
Neil Conway Review Request 56245: Fixed typos in name of test suite. Thu, 02 Feb, 22:58
Michael Park   Re: Review Request 56245: Fixed typos in name of test suite. Fri, 03 Feb, 23:56
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Oct 202046
Sep 2020188
Aug 2020388
Jul 2020125
Jun 202033
May 2020154
Apr 2020285
Mar 2020342
Feb 2020191
Jan 2020303
Dec 2019159
Nov 2019239
Oct 2019162
Sep 2019312
Aug 2019540
Jul 2019707
Jun 2019621
May 2019472
Apr 2019702
Mar 2019955
Feb 2019758
Jan 2019749
Dec 2018455
Nov 2018598
Oct 2018832
Sep 2018704
Aug 20181218
Jul 20181040
Jun 20181026
May 20181520
Apr 20181445
Mar 20181350
Feb 20181396
Jan 20181470
Dec 20171464
Nov 20171769
Oct 20171445
Sep 20171054
Aug 20171341
Jul 20171295
Jun 20171475
May 20171547
Apr 20171266
Mar 20172102
Feb 20171631
Jan 20171655
Dec 20161774
Nov 20162300
Oct 20162196
Sep 20162748
Aug 20162311
Jul 20163001
Jun 20163216
May 20162928
Apr 20163332
Mar 20164025
Feb 20162997
Jan 20163700
Dec 20152431
Nov 20152744
Oct 20152284
Sep 20152621
Aug 20152300
Jul 20152051
Jun 20152449
May 20151444
Apr 2015338