mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zhitao Li <zhitaoli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 56867: WIP: Added upgrade guide for 1.2.x.
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2017 01:04:54 GMT


> On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:20 p.m., Zhitao Li wrote:
> > docs/upgrades.md, lines 252-260
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/diff/1/?file=1640650#file1640650line252>
> >
> >     1. Is the order of these actions matter? I recall we specifically say order
of upgrading each component does not mater, so I'm interested in why this is being explicitly
called out;
> >     2. Is this specific to 1.1.x -> 1.2.x upgrade, or serves just a general guideline
regardless of versions? (if former, maybe call out the reason; if latter, maybe move to a
different location).
> 
> Adam B wrote:
>     1. We generally recommend upgrading masters before agents (and rebuilding modules
before either).
>     2. This is nothing new to 1.2.x, and is actually included in each release's section
(except 1.1.x). The order/recommendation doesn't usually change much, although it has evolved
as we have added modules and clarified the need for scheduler/executor upgrades.

Thanks for the clarification.


- Zhitao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/#review166262
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 21, 2017, 7:57 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2017, 7:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added upgrade guide for 1.2.x.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/upgrades.md 74f4367020d7025bdcfbbf50a166a644ee5050bc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adam B
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message