-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/#review163632
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fix it, then Ship it!
src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp (lines 944 - 945)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/#comment235102>
This seems like an odd test. Unforunate that we can't seem to use `Allocation` because
of this.
src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp (lines 3408 - 3411)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/#comment235101>
Should just use `foreachpair` twice here I think. A few places below as well.
src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp (lines 3728 - 3730)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/#comment235103>
Operators should be placed in the previous lines I think?
I think maybe it'd be better if we were to just pull out the `allocatedTaskResources`?
```cpp
AllocatedResources allocatedTaskResources(task.resources(), "role1");
expected = Allocation::create(
framework2.id(),
{{"role1",
{{slave.id(), updated.get() - allocatedTaskResources + volume}}}});
```
src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp (lines 3810 - 3813)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/#comment235104>
`s/allocation/allocated/` since we have an `Allocation` type now? Also, could you have
used `AllocatedResources` here?
src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp (line 4180)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/#comment235106>
`{` on the newline.
- Michael Park
On Jan. 25, 2017, 4:46 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 25, 2017, 4:46 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu and Michael Park.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Update the allocator unit tests to reflect MULTI_ROLE support.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 1edd0ecc8a93cd41532e1cf3641f67c780ab23a5
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55967/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> make check
>
> note that the rest of the tests do not pass until after my subsequent patches
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Benjamin Mahler
>
>
|