> On Nov. 10, 2016, 7:19 a.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> > Before doing full review, I am wondering if we can create a new protobuf called `DockerExecutorPrepareInfo` or something similar with the idea that we can pass on not only environment variables, but also volumes (and any other options in future). The volumes are interesting because a module might want to make available certain file paths within Docker executor. Is this something reasonable?
> 
> Till Toenshoff wrote:
>     I like that idea a lot. Let me reiterate with that on this patch.

Are we dropping this patch in favor of https://reviews.apache.org/r/53998/ ?


- Adam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53308/#review155592
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 31, 2016, 8:49 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53308/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 31, 2016, 8:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Kapil Arya, and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6396
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6396
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Allows for modifying the environment effective for the executor itself.
> Additionally allows the hook to receive the location of the sandbox folder.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/hook.hpp c8a58641e0768628a9028a70d8c244448f7fb412 
>   src/hook/manager.hpp 5ecfcab48da808c84d36f9bcfcb5a8e0ad2167e5 
>   src/hook/manager.cpp 24885226a788a7abd851e12b527f74fa972ec935 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp f720320e112687e8ae972f04159b3b4cb7a58476 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53308/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check and functional test in a hook-module
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>