-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#review154577
-----------------------------------------------------------




CHANGELOG (line 102)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224192>

    How about something to annotate what level of bug this is?
    examples:
    `Unresolved Critical Issues`
    maybe someone else has other suggestions.



CHANGELOG (line 106)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224193>

    From the ticket MESOS-5533 seems like a documentation issue. Should we verify with Kapil and lower the priority so we can remove it from this list?



CHANGELOG (line 108)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224194>

    Same here. Let's just fix this and move on. I don't see how this is beneficial to consumers of the change log.



CHANGELOG (line 113)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/#comment224196>

    Same here. I understand this is a security issue; however, if we want to report all security issues currently I think We'd have a long long list?


- Joris Van Remoortere


On Nov. 2, 2016, 3:46 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 2, 2016, 3:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CHANGELOG ed78657492eb3a708cdeaf9cf40d0a70270a5699 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53381/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None: not a functional change.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>