mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Park <mp...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 52645: Harden Mesos
Date Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:02:26 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52645/#review156250
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Michael Park


On Nov. 9, 2016, 11:37 a.m., Aaron Wood wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52645/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 9, 2016, 11:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, James Peach, Michael Park, and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6229
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6229
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add hardened flags for Mesos.
> Take compile flag macro at 1a869696e4129279f7b99c3f9052717354b79a86.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac 5380cbc 
>   m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4 PRE-CREATION 
>   src/Makefile.am 5a47c93 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52645/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compared the benchmarks with and without the flags being used. Also did a comparsion
with the flags being used with and without optimizations and without the flags being used
with and without optimizations. Overall the performance hit was very small with a 3-8% overhead
(optimizations brings this down slightly). Most benchmarks were about 5% (or less) slower.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aaron Wood
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message