> On Nov. 4, 2016, 2:41 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp, lines 36-37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/diff/1/?file=1553266#file1553266line36>
> >
> > I am unsure what style is preferred here. We could (a) order header groups by
directory depth (that's e.g., the reason `slave/containerizer/mesos/linux_launcher.hpp` is
on l.29, not below l.36, or (b) keep related headers together. I can see both patterns in
the code base. Maybe you have an idea.
I'd prefer the former (sort by directory depth, then lexicographically).
- Neil
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/#review154904
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 3, 2016, 4:23 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Nov. 3, 2016, 4:23 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Joseph Wu.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Fixed header include order.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp ca7bffd3b1773a11a4679d114885d3edd977b02b
> src/tests/containerizer/mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp 4df537747d84daa68c29e2d05b22fa386a4a16db
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> `make check`
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil Conway
>
>
|