mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos ReviewBot <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 51784: Supported merging the launch command from isolators.
Date Sun, 11 Sep 2016 03:22:52 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51784/#review148413
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [51784]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose'
ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker_build.sh

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Sept. 11, 2016, 12:17 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51784/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 11, 2016, 12:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Gilbert Song.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5275
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5275
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, we only allow one isolator to specify the launch command
> for the container. This is not ideal because multiple isolators might
> want to add some flags to the command executor. For instance, the
> 'docker/runtime' isolator wants to specify '--task_command' and
> '--working_directory', and 'linux/capabilities' isolator wants to
> specify '--capabilities'.
> 
> This patch changes the semantics so that launch command from isolators
> are merged. However, it is isolator's responsibility to make sure the
> merged command is a valid command.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 89b7e8db38916d69d9b2d4fe305d4397b0859a10

> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51784/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message