mesos-reviews mailing list archives

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#review140833
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.hpp (lines 483 - 484)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206168>

    swap the order of the arguments.
    
    s/active//
    
    here and everywhere else.
    
    is this backwards comptabile? old master <-> new agent and new master <->
old agent?



src/master/master.hpp (line 1680)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206166>

    Can you add a comment here on what `recovered` represents?



src/master/master.cpp (lines 922 - 923)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206169>

    swap the order.
    
    s/active_//



src/master/master.cpp (lines 4757 - 4758)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206170>

    swap the order.



src/master/master.cpp (lines 4942 - 4943)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206171>

    swap and s/active//



src/master/master.cpp (lines 5013 - 5042)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206178>

    I think we should change this as follows for clarity:
    
    ```
    foreach (const FrameworkInfo& frameworkInfo, frameworks) {
      
      Framework* framework = getFramework(frameworkInfo.id());
      
      if (framework != nullptr) {
        // Send UpdateFrameworkMessage
      } else {
        // Add it recovered map.
      }
    
    }
    
    ```



src/master/master.cpp (line 5034)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206175>

    // If a framework known to the agent has not yet re-registered with the master
    // add it to the `recovered` map.



src/messages/messages.proto (lines 421 - 422)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206165>

    swap the order.
    
    also s/active_frameworks/frameworks/



src/slave/slave.cpp (lines 1411 - 1413)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/#comment206164>

    move this TODO to #1416


- Vinod Kone


On July 5, 2016, 8:43 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 5, 2016, 8:43 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously after a master failover while agents
> were reregistering we might not have access
> to all FrameworkInfo (which would first be available
> once the Framework reregistered). This patch
> adds support that once a framework reregisters
> we also keep track of recovered FrameworkInfos.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp be7cd239c49a0710a29a8187c01484f9f6d615e1 
>   src/master/master.cpp 78a8889313179b4509a6657e6c61d9f6d3bb99c0 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 6d7eccc5501b3df010d981e09d0654e815da551f 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp da643e6e50b2f313705d2f862c961291aa5d2f22 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> (sudo) make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>