mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zhitao Li <zhitaoli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 49464: Updated operator APIs proto files for `GET_EXECUTORS` call.
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:21:47 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49464/#review140284
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/master/master.proto (line 61)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49464/#comment205662>

    I think this also does not apply cleanly on master anymore after Task/Framework patch.
Can you rebase?


- Zhitao Li


On June 30, 2016, 7:04 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49464/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 30, 2016, 7:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Abhishek Dasgupta, Anand Mazumdar, zhou xing, Jay Guo, Shuai
Lin, Vinod Kone, and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5750
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5750
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated operator APIs proto files for `GET_EXECUTORS` call.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/master/master.proto 2e5d6eeb3a960e4f41c382d65321f18bb05ed6be 
>   include/mesos/v1/master/master.proto 93157d57dcc53b54fed2ebbc4772c689ddba2119 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49464/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message