mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Park <mp...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 47069: Added `user` field to `Task` protobuf message.
Date Sat, 21 May 2016 05:49:06 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47069/#review134233
-----------------------------------------------------------



Do we not need to update other parts such as `bool operator==(const Task&, const Task&);`,
and exposing the `user` field in `/state`, etc?

- Michael Park


On May 17, 2016, 9:28 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47069/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 17, 2016, 9:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Alexander Rojas, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The LocalAuthorizer might use the OS \`user\` for
> authorization of tasks, so we add it to the \`Task\` protobuf
> message. Note that the master stores \`Task\` (as opposed
> to \`TaskInfo\`) for running and completed tasks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 887ffe9c5f04e25539a4c6b3d52ce5299c65e8d3 
>   src/common/protobuf_utils.cpp 4f4711d54c471922f1a103310d4d360e41a99870 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47069/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> tested entire chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message