-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44893/#review127894
-----------------------------------------------------------
Does mesos compile after applying this patch? If not, I would rather not split the patch.
Yes, we prefer smaller patches, but each of them should be an atomic change, instead of just
splitting a large patch into smaller pieces. There's no point of doing that.
Could you please merge those non-atomic changes into one patch? Otherwise, it's hard to reason
what have you done.
- Jie Yu
On April 3, 2016, 2:12 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44893/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 3, 2016, 2:12 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ian Downes, Jie Yu, Till Toenshoff, and Timothy
Chen.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-5086
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5086
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Remove fetcher header file in containerizer.hpp.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/local/local.cpp 06f6118a5038149f87e970b5cdf7987a270d3fae
> src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp ff78b4d0fd4a3b862f6019fc757c16b7367cd3cf
> src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp 89d450e10a84f24ddd46d517e2b4b46ab02c4fda
> src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp a6e3a8b43fb7591ff6f23b019a062696c8bfb719
> src/slave/slave.cpp fc77f594d16a9fb2ca001e089d74e2c0ffeb5baa
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44893/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> haosdent huang
>
>
|