mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jie Yu" <yujie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 42334: Changed 'ReservationInfo.principal' from required to optional.
Date Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:43:37 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42334/#review114879
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/master/validation.cpp (line 667)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42334/#comment175714>

    We don't put \n in error message. I'll fix it for you.



src/master/validation.cpp (line 669)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42334/#comment175715>

    We don't put period in the end. I'll fix it for you.


- Jie Yu


On Jan. 16, 2016, 4:30 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42334/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 16, 2016, 4:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4382
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4382
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed `ReservationInfo.principal` from required to optional.
> 
> In order to allow dynamic reservation without a principal, this field is being changed
to optional. However, the current patch alters the master to invalidate any reserve operations
that do not set this field. After a deprecation cycle, the master will allow the field to
be unset.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto b12e0f3eff44d90ec01360fc08bf9e597d7ed9dd 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto fa7e82e03b11cf6619a4f16e8e0fbbf755bf210c 
>   src/master/validation.cpp c7cf56815fc743ff52ef423b23d78398ad1b35a3 
>   src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp fbf8fadbc04a7cbc60ee6091e0224339389b400f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42334/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> A new test was added, `ReserveOperationValidationTest.ReservationInfoMissingPrincipal`,
within the master validation tests, to ensure that a `ReservationInfo` with no principal will
be invalidated.
> 
> `make check` was used to test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message