mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Mahler" <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 40975: Document that libprocess ignores SIGPIPE
Date Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:32:38 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/#review112206
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/README.md (lines 536 - 544)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/#comment172546>

    Hm.. since this document is about programming, do we need to say 'programming notes'?
Or is 'notes' enough?
    
    It would be nice to also explain why we do this.


- Ben Mahler


On Dec. 4, 2015, 5:33 p.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 4, 2015, 5:33 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Document that libprocess ignores SIGPIPE.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/README.md c3f309a7dc1c94882c4cc97eeaf0736c2fca0ba5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message