mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexander Rojas" <alexan...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 37108: Remove unused failover functionality in scheduler library
Date Thu, 06 Aug 2015 09:42:52 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37108/#review94387
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Alexander Rojas


On Aug. 5, 2015, 3:19 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37108/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 5, 2015, 3:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We now leave it upto the client to set the force option when making the subscribe call.
This existed in the pre-Call era as force(failover) was not exposed to the scheduler. ( was
part of FrameworkReRegisterMessage not exposed to the scheduler )
> 
> We anyways were not using this as of now.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp 97fa2c063db506dec69ff1edd851c96b4e1219a4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37108/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message