> On July 7, 2015, 11:40 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > CHANGELOG, line 337
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36269/diff/1/?file=1001355#file1001355line337>
> >
> > I would just put this under deprecations section.
> >
> > Also, mind updating MESOS-2058 in deprecation section to do s/deprecate/remove/
because its been removed.
Adam is against putting MESOS-2640 in 0.23.0 because it's committed after rc1 is cut. This
review doesn't even need to land now.
s/deprecate/remove/ on MESOS-2058 can be done separately.
- Jiang Yan
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36269/#review90756
-----------------------------------------------------------
On July 7, 2015, 10:59 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36269/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 7, 2015, 10:59 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos and Adam B.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Per Vinod's comment on /r/36005
>
> The `**Cleanup` section makes sense?
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> CHANGELOG 433924a0e614f061c448a8e85d0a2825567150dc
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36269/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiang Yan Xu
>
>
|