mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benjamin Hindman" <b...@berkeley.edu>
Subject Re: Review Request 35562: Removed unnecessary use of os::ExecEnv.
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:07:50 GMT


> On June 17, 2015, 8:32 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp, line 221
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/diff/1/?file=986460#file986460line221>
> >
> >     Does this TODO refer to a "clean environment" as being an environment without
anything being set [envp={NULL}]? In any case, does it still make sense to have this TODO?

Ah, that TODO actually gets handled by a subsequent patch, the one that introduces the stripping,
i.e., a "clean environment". ;-) I'll just leave it out and drop this issue unless you really
would like me to delete the TODO in the subsequent review. :-p


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/#review88272
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 17, 2015, 2:28 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 17, 2015, 2:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2832
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2832
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp 2f2d60e2011f60ec711d3b29fd2c157e30c83c34 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message