mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benjamin Hindman" <b...@berkeley.edu>
Subject Re: Review Request 35090: Update libprocess process to use synchronized.
Date Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:01:18 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35090/#review87814
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


At this point we might as well s/m/mutex/ to be more clear since folks won't use 'lock()'
and 'unlock()'. I'll take care of that for you and commit!

- Benjamin Hindman


On June 5, 2015, 7:42 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35090/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 5, 2015, 7:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Bernd Mathiske.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2805
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2805
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/process.hpp 79d1719932a3fdc90b6247d3a77adee123e72435

>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp d1b4d469a11abc618c1406bce602300dd9793b58 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35090/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message