-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/#review86767
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [34968, 34969, 34970]
Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 34970
Error:
2015-06-05 06:24:06 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/diff/raw/ [16370/16370] ->
"34970.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/examples/no_executor_framework.cpp:16
error: src/examples/no_executor_framework.cpp: patch does not apply
Failed to apply patch
- Mesos ReviewBot
On June 5, 2015, 5:52 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 5, 2015, 5:52 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Kone.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-2655
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2655
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Now the NoExecutorScheduler can take a custom command, as well as the resources for the
task and how many tasks to run.
>
> This allows us to continue using it for an end-to-end test as part of make check, but
also allows it to be used against a cluster in a long-lived fashion.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/examples/no_executor_framework.cpp 37001c389f31f9f1dafe6d7f3eb17adc2e369057
> src/tests/no_executor_framework_test.sh d2d395595b778bc543e1baaa0fd415dc622b647f
> src/tests/script.cpp 515e3141e1d517da4cfc1421d5301d0a3bd6ad51
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34970/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> The existing no executor framework test picks this up.
>
> Since we do not have an non-zero estimator yet, I modified the slave to send revocable
resources in order to manually test the revocable case.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben Mahler
>
>
|