mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mesos ReviewBot" <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 34195: Refactoring to use BaseFlags common functionality
Date Wed, 27 May 2015 05:00:39 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34195/#review85321
-----------------------------------------------------------


Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [34193, 34195]

All tests passed.

- Mesos ReviewBot


On May 26, 2015, 8:58 p.m., Marco Massenzio wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34195/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 26, 2015, 8:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2711
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2711
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Jira: MESOS-2711
> 
> All the main() methods have been refactored to use the
> definition of FlagsBase::help flag and FlagsBase::usage().
> 
> This CL also tries to bring some uniformity to the
> use of exit codes: if this is deemed to be worth
> making it uniform, we can come up with common
> rules and extend the changes here to be compliant.
> 
> This touches a lot of files, but keep scrolling, and you will see a pattern emerge.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cli/execute.cpp dbd19e67f56a150f54180ad13e6402842eb68e17 
>   src/cli/resolve.cpp a99b6094dffc9f7aa44bcf63ad40121e1abb120b 
>   src/examples/load_generator_framework.cpp be1a3bf5f16bd811cb4039c8f15478183712a426

>   src/examples/persistent_volume_framework.cpp 8a893fcfa3d5d988a88fdeaf0bfc08e0a49b7a65

>   src/health-check/main.cpp a4ce742ab8deff1ebd99359112670493fdaeeac3 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp de6f1b104a765a8e53934154e78872b03695b24c 
>   src/local/main.cpp a641b9e83862743890597a2981a9419517e7c589 
>   src/log/tool/benchmark.cpp 01e55115f35d155efbea190b5308b294ba76e7cb 
>   src/log/tool/initialize.cpp ccda7fb1c0f7113f865ec61adee76b2ea6180442 
>   src/log/tool/read.cpp d14138502f5bc9a725deb83da505765865da017f 
>   src/log/tool/replica.cpp 3985fc7df4f7153ae623589fbdd769ccbae57125 
>   src/master/main.cpp d5666bc8ee8d7a0f0b8685f76d65dd1f9ac2a280 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.hpp c72fb47f60f40cda8d84a10497b9133f83cf018e

>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp 49e983edab598e2ac487bb488fdd12840a9e7dfc

>   src/slave/main.cpp f762f5b06be74c391cbc336b2da28f8358952ba4 
>   src/tests/main.cpp e3fff5d60c0468c0d258f2bb301efc1309c071b0 
>   src/usage/main.cpp 97f55e938dc7678f8331970d8953d09218f70902 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34195/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> **NOTE** this fixes completely the chained changes from 34193 and makes all the tests
pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marco Massenzio
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message