mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Timothy Chen" <tnac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 33249: Send statusUpdate to scheduler on containerizer launch failure
Date Tue, 12 May 2015 06:57:10 GMT


> On May 11, 2015, 11:07 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > Thanks Jay the changes looks reasonable to me, will wait for Jie to comment.
> 
> Jay Buffington wrote:
>     Great, thanks!  When you commit can you add the three separate commits that are here:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/compare/master...jaybuff:report-launch-failure?expand=1
>     
>     rather than just one big commit?

Sure, but can you next time submit seperate reviews then? It's hard to check that what you
have is exactly what you put in the reviewboard, and bugs might just slip in.


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#review83310
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2015, 10:06 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2015, 10:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Jie Yu, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2020 and MESOS-2656
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2020
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2656
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Send statusUpdate to scheduler on containerizer launch failure
> 
> This review is actually for three commits.  The three commits are separated out on github
here:
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/compare/master...jaybuff:report-launch-failure?expand=1
> 
> Commit #1:
> docker-no-executor-framework example should send ContainerInfo
> 
> docker-no-executor-framework stopped working when the protobuf message
> changed during development.  Apparently noone noticed because we don't
> run it as part of our test suite.  I used it to develop a fix for
> proper error reporting, so I fixed it.
> 
> Commit #2:
> serialize wait and destroy in containerizer
> 
> Containerizers keep track of all the containers they have created.  When
> a container is destroy()'ed the containerizer removes the container from
> its internal hashmap.  This means that wait() must be called before the
> container is destroyed.
> 
> When the docker containerizer fails because of a "docker pull" or
> "docker run" failure, we end up with a race condition where wait() does
> not properly return the Termination, so we ended up with a default
> failure message of "Abnormal Executor Termination" which isn't very
> useful.
> 
> This commit solves this issue by not destroying the container until
> after wait is called in the failure case.
> 
> Fixes MESOS-2656
> 
> Commit #3:
> send scheduler containerizer launch failure errors
> 
> If a method in the launch sequence returns a failure the error message
> wasn't making it back to the scheduler.
> 
> Fixes MESOS-2020
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/containerizer/containerizer.proto 95c84dfbecef28ca9a220a98293c5fc6215a692f

>   src/examples/docker_no_executor_framework.cpp d5385d9295d30a6039bab9938f3270006582d3da

>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp 56c088abb036aa26c323c3142fd27ea29ed51d4f

>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp b25ec55bf3cd30d6e8a804d09d90c632a7d12e3f 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp f9fc89ad7e3c853c3f9f6dcf9aa68e54dc1888c6 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 5e5f13ed8a71ff9510b40b6032d00fd16d312622

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp f2587280dc0e1d566d2b856a80358c7b3896c603

>   src/slave/slave.cpp c78ee3c9e7fc38ad364e83f4abe267e86bfbbc13 
>   src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp c9d66b3fbc7d081f36c26781573dca50de823c44 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I used examples/docker_no_executor_framework.cpp, and wrote a few tests and ran make
check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Buffington
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message