On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Frank McQuillan <email@example.com> wrote:
> Agree with Rahul re putting up an RC2 with the suggested changes from Roman,
> including incorporating Ed's comments on copyright year and top level folder
> naming. These are really items but let's respond to the RC1 reviewers the
> best way we can.
+1 to a respin.
> Regarding the ASF legal issue being discussed, MADLib community is more than
> happy to respond to any guidance from the fine folks at the ASF around
> headers with appropriate licensing verbage. We just need to know what that
> guidance is.
Well, if you're ok respinning next week I hope to get you a final
answer by then.
Might as well kill two birds with the same RC. Or we can quickly do a follow up
release once the licensing headers dust settles. Up to you guys.